I’m sitting here in front of a blank word document,
terrified to write about the subject everyone’s been talking about. In fact, I
do not know if this will ever see the light of day. The Internet, while it is a
wonderful thing in so many aspects, has taken away many individuals’ ability to
communicate in a civilized way. We have degraded ourselves to attacking and
name calling and passively aggressively liking comments from others of the same
opinion that make aggressive comments when we ourselves don’t want to be the
scapegoat.
I’m shaking a bit as I begin to write this paragraph, out of
fear of how these attackers and passive aggressive likers will react to my
words should I choose to publish them. Despite my best efforts, I have a thin
skin, and while I am passionately opinionated, I would rather have a calm
conversation about two sides of an issue than throw something in your face and
be attacked for it.
#BrockTurnerIsARapist
“This is what a rapist looks like”
“He is…not even a human at this point. He is a rapist.”
“I hope someone gets him while he’s in there.”
You all know what we’re talking about. These are only a very
few of the numerous posts and comments I have seen regarding the “Stanford Rape
Case.” The vast majority of comments and posts have been of a similar nature to
the above quotes. I have spent several years providing therapy to and
interacting with individuals with sex offenses, so I have a unique point of
view on this topic that I feel needs to be heard.
Let’s look at some background.
Firstly, we must understand the subtlety of sexual offense
charges. Brock Turner is in fact not, technically, a “rapist.” Rape involves
penetration of a vagina by a penis. Turner was convicted of sexual assault,
which can encompass a great many things, but in his case, it means that foreign
objects and fingers were forcibly inserted into the victim’s vagina. They are
both sex offenses, but they are not the same. In the same way, child
molestation is not rape; possession of child pornography is not rape. All of
these sexual offense charges have specific definitions.
“So what’s the difference?” You might think. “He still
penetrated her, so I’m going to call him a rapist.”
The difference is in manner of thinking and risk level. In
sex offender therapy, we refer to “thinking errors.” These are ingrained
anti-social ways of thinking that deviate strongly from the norm and are
indicative of criminal behavior. What type of sexual offender exhibits the most
thinking errors? It varies, but typically we see the highest rate of thinking
errors in sexual psychopaths (e.g., Ted Bundy) and pedophiles. These
individuals are also at the highest risk level when assessing for actuarial
risk. They are the most threatening to society as a whole because their ways of
thinking are so pervasive and not at all amenable to change. Read: they are
most likely to commit another sex offense.
“But wait a minute,” you may say, “These are sex offenders we’re talking about here.
Anyone with a sex offense is a threat to society and should be locked up for
good. They are a threat to our children and our loved ones.”
Sex offenders are the most stigmatized criminal population
by far, somewhat deservingly so when considering the nature of the crime. But
the data show us that sexual offenders are, in fact, NOT likely to commit
another sex crime. The national recidivism rate for all criminals is between 65
and 75 percent, depending on the crime. That means that 65-75 percent of people
who commit a crime will commit another crime in their lifetime. Sex offenders
have a recidivism rate of between 35 and 45 percent, all the way down to less
than 10 percent for juveniles and some first-time or lesser offenders. Interestingly
enough, sex offenders are, generally speaking, not a threat to society.
Thirty-five to 45 percent is nothing to sneeze at, but when
considering data across all types of crimes, it is important to keep this in
mind. It is also to important to consider that, despite what most people think,
sex offenders are among the most easily rehabilitated criminal populations.
Cognitive-behavioral treatments have a huge success rate.
So who has the lowest recidivism rates out of all criminals? Sex offenders. Second
lowest? Murderers. Who has the highest rate? Property criminals and drug
offenders. Turns out, the worse the crime is, the less likely it is to happen
again. Thank goodness.
So why are people so up in arms about the Brock Turner case?
From what I can glean, there are four major reasons. Firstly, his own and his
loved ones’ testimonies to keep him from a lengthy prison sentence were
conceived as ridiculous by many. Secondly, his victim wrote a touching and heartfelt
letter that went viral. Thirdly, the man didn’t receive any type of prison
sentence – At. All. Finally, race and class of course confound all of these
issues.
I will gloss over the first two, because to me they are not
indicative of the larger issue at hand. I am of the opinion that testimonies
from friends and family were weighted too strongly during this trial. While
these individuals know Turner as a person, they are not knowledgeable about sex
offenders and their patterns and therefore their information is largely
irrelevant, I think, to the criminal issue at hand.
Unfortunately—and I think I’ll get a lot of shit for this—I
feel the same way about the victim’s letter. Both sides were making
emotionally-based arguments that, in my opinion, have little relevance a court
room. Do victims need a voice? Let me not stutter when I say this:
ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY.
BUT.
The victim’s subjective view of his/her perpetrator does not
take into account the objective risk of the perpetrator. We must consider what
is best for society as a whole, especially when prisons and jails are so
expensive (another issue for another time, but still relevant).
According to the family/friends, Turner is an otherwise
perfect dude who is amazing at all he does. According to the victim, he is a
piece of shit that should never see the light of day again and he is wholly a
villain.
Most people agree with the second assessment, but in fact,
like most things in life, he falls somewhere in between.
Moving on. Although it was not explicitly stated (I don’t
think, but correct me if I’m wrong), the judge is using what I would call
“shock incarceration” or “shock treatment,” which is an entirely ridiculous way
to address the issue. Turner appears to be of a mid-level risk (it could be
mid-low or mid-high depending on variables of which I am unaware). I cannot say
this for certain, as I know very little about Turner’s ways of thinking and
personality, but this is based on risk factors that are observable.
In my opinion, Turner should have received a prison sentence
with required sex offender therapy where he could address any thinking errors
or other issues that did not arise in court. Do I think he is of imminent risk
to society? I don’t think so, but I don’t know. Should he still have been
sentenced despite his possible low risk? Duh. It’s a fucking felony.
Finally, let’s talk about how this dude is rich and white
and talented. It’s common knowledge that the justice system is biased against
African Americans, especially males. It’s disgusting and hateful, and it has
made me very sad throughout all the years that I have worked in corrections.
How about poverty or wealth? You bet it plays a part. His swimming scores don’t
make a damn bit of difference to me, and I don’t think they did to the courts
either, but people keep bringing it up as another reason why he got off….so,
there you go.
But here the thing: Brock Turner still a person. In social
work, we like to talk about “person first” language (e.g., an individual with
schizophrenia as opposed to a schizophrenic). Were his crimes heinous?
Absolutely. Is he a disgusting person? It’s very possible. Is he no longer
human because of what he did? No. He is a human who needs some help, and a
human who got a bullshit non-sentence, but he is a human nonetheless. He is a
human who committed a sex crime.
Here’s the other thing: Brock Turner not the reason the
justice system is failing. He is a scapegoat. Is the justice system shitty? In
some ways, yes. Is it biased? YES. YES YES YES. Is it Turner’s fault that the
justice system is this way? No. Let’s choose to fight for African American
males as opposed to against white males. It will be much more productive.
Here’s the final thing, and perhaps more of a personal
grievance: Wishing ill on Brock Turner because of his crimes is unproductive
and disrespectful. I feel many will disagree with me on this, because again,
the stigmatization and fear surrounding sex offenders is high, but hoping that he
will get raped in jail just because he didn’t get a sentence that is satisfying
to you makes no sense. If you’re pissed off about the sentence (or lack
thereof), GOOD. I agree. Let’s search for change at a higher level and make a
difference for all offenders as opposed to choosing one to defame. Let’s ensure
that all individuals get appropriate sentences, black or white, rich or poor.
There are so many issues in this case that I could go on and
on for days. Race, class, location, type of crime, stigma, labeling,
misunderstanding, myths, fears. I feel I am only scratching the surface here,
but I wanted to give a more fully rounded view of this case instead of merely
smearing Turner’s picture all over the Internet.
As a woman, despite my knowledge and experience in this
arena, cases like this make me a little bit more scared to live in this world.
As a social worker and sex offender therapist…I would fucking KILL to work with
this dude. And that would make me a human with a murder charge.
